Want More Info?


Powered by Rollyo



« Was Jesus Black? | Main | Becoming Christian ¦ Kierkegaard »

March 18, 2008

Comments

Nic

Had an interesting conversation with BT.
They are running Phorm, you can opt out here:

http://www.webwise.com/


BT are scum. Quicker we circumvent them, the better. Bring on Pynchon's 'posthorn'.

Mike R

Hi Kes

Thanks for flagging this up.

What disgusts me the most is that they they'll happily let ISPs target-sell us like this, but won't regulate ISPs to stem illegal downloads of music or whatever.

Ridiculous double-standards on their part, I reckon.

Nic

Mike, I know we should show a united front against the capitalist-pig-dogs. but are you really disgusted by 'free' music? Come-on BitTorrent (so I've heard)!

Maybe, just maybe 'freeware' offers a glimpse of future value systems and currencies. But back to the point— BT are the bad-guys.

Kester

Perhaps there are weird synergies here: the less money people are making through normal income streams (like selling music) the more they're going to try to do stealth wealth.

It's now we'll see just how far down the river the net has been sold... the more we pull back the cable, the more we'll see every damn government snooping already.

Nic

Synergy is a good word to use, the ‘unexpected’ fallout from interaction. Although, I think ‘stealth wealth’ is more about shareholders and rabid capitalism. Organizations trying too squeeze every last drop of value out of assets— rinsing the planet.

How do we revalue value? How does respect for the environment and each other get hardwired back into currency? When will sustainability become a component of currency— a shift to more time-based currencies might help?

That’s why ‘fee music’ is so interesting. In a way it can be seen to be asking a question. Yet unfortunately, it’s a language that consumerism doesn’t understand, and so it tries to answer in the only way it knows how— ring-fence something else, for instance, live music.

There are alternative currencies and value systems out there.

Mike R

Yeh, the problem with free music is that the artist gets squeezed as well as the record company.

I'll dig out the facts as best I can, but on a 79p download, the artist gets pennies in royalty. You've got to ask where the lions share of the costs go. Same with CD sales.

So, yeh - it would be very easy to say "screw the record company", but really the artist is the one that gets screwed the most (again).

Mike R

Here you go - these two articles I found accord with my (admittedly limited) knowledge of what an artist actually gets.

http://www.ascap.com/musicbiz/money-recording.html

http://entertainment.howstuffworks.com/music-royalties6.htm


It's worth bearing in mind that the "admin charge" (wasn't it 45p?) on Radiohead's recent free download of In Rainbows, would be about the same as what they would have got in royalties from the sale of a CD.

Nic

http://www.metamute.org/en/Zombie-Nation

Nic

http://www.metamute.org/en/Zombie-Nation

Nic

Better use of panoptic-wear, turn it into an ambient game!

http://pmog.com/

Mike R

BTW, I was not "disgusted by the idea of free music", I just thought its was disgusting that they can do what they want with ISPs when it suits them.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Endorsed by...

See all Endorsements...
and reviews.

Tip Jar

Tip Jar