I guess sometimes you can't see the woods for the trees. I recently posted a piece about René Girard's thoughts on the essentiality of the sacred to human experience - something Dawkins et al ignore in their anti-religion positions - and I also posted something on Facebook and friendship.
But it took a beer with Nic - as so often it does - for the obvious connection to jump out: all social networking sites are simply virtual ways of touching the sacred.
In the Girard piece, Roger Scruton defines the sacred as "moments that stand outside time, in which the loneliness and anxiety of the human individual is confronted and overcome, through immersion in the group"
There can be no better definition of why Web 2.0 / Social Networking has taken off: we are all desperately raising antennae, trying to channel from the web these moments of immersion, moments when someone wants to link to us, wants to comment on our thoughts, wants to tag us, accepts us in their group.
My skepticism about the extent to which these moments actually can occur on the web thus highlight a further problem, and a further opportunity. The historic ways in which people have accessed the sacred have been eroded: community, church, neighbours - even conscription - and yet the virtual substitutes of MySpace, Facebook etc., are proving inadequate. Easy as it may be to whip up a network of hundreds of friends and connections, the actual sacred moment is still elusive.
This is the problem. And the opportunity is clearly this: we need to be providing these sacred spaces, and if we do so in an unthreatening way, people will flock there. Which they already do: check out the huge surge in popularity of festivals recently. Connected to the rise in virtual living, and the demise of the traditionally sacred? I'd say definitely. We all need a little carnival to feel connected. Which is why I'll be off to Greenbelt again at the end of the month.
Technorati: Facebook | Festival | Girard | Greenbelt | MySpace | Carnival | Sacred | Scruton | Social Networking | Web 2.0
Once again, Kester, you've nailed it - nothing replaces human contact. That's why I still go to church a few times a month because I can feed my mind elsewhere but I need to taste the wafer and the wine and actually hug a live body.
Posted by: becky garrison | August 03, 2007 at 01:58 PM
This is a very good post and a very good point!!! Thank you!!!
Posted by: rev. todd | August 03, 2007 at 03:53 PM
Personally, I would rather be lonely and anxious than a conscript. A conscript is a convict--nothing sacred about that!
Would you be willing to spread the word about www.draftresistance.org? It's a site dedicated to shattering the myths surrounding the selective slavery system and building mass civil disobedience to stop the draft before it starts.
Our banner on a website, printing and posting the anti-draft flyer or just telling friends would help.
Thanks!
Scott Kohlhaas
PS. When it comes to conscription, an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure!
Posted by: Scott Kohlhaas | August 06, 2007 at 06:09 AM
i just happened to randomly come across your blog. and i must stay that i fully enjoyed it. the more community i experience the more i see the need for it.
the quote about what is sacred rocked!
thanks...i'll be back:)
Posted by: melanie macdonald | August 14, 2007 at 01:20 PM
Its like you read my mind! You seem to know so much about this, like you wrote the book in it or something. I think that you could do with some pics to drive the message home a bit, but other than that, this is great blog. A great read. Ill definitely be back.
Posted by: uggs outlet | November 01, 2010 at 02:29 AM
Thanks for sharing this. Like your blog, so wanted to comment before I leave.
Posted by: Vacatures Systeembeheerder | November 15, 2010 at 08:09 PM
All about fun! Networking can be really fun and addictive as well for many.
Posted by: epm solutions | June 01, 2011 at 06:21 AM